Timeline for Low Quality Dog Food - What are the risks?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Apr 23, 2020 at 7:11 | history | suggested | lila | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor noise removal, scientific names of species italicized, fixed few typos.
|
| Apr 22, 2020 at 21:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 23, 2020 at 7:11 | |||||
| Dec 27, 2019 at 20:17 | vote | accept | Citizen | ||
| Dec 20, 2019 at 10:22 | comment | added | virolino | Also note: natually, a cat's food is entire mice, as opposed to pork liver. That should provide enough argument that the study was terribly flawed. IMO | |
| Dec 20, 2019 at 10:21 | comment | added | virolino | Just curious: how can "a pork liver-based raw food" be healthy for anyone or anything in the world? No food for anyone / anything should be limited to only one ingredient for the entire life. That is the basics of nutrition everywhere. Moreover, the liver is a very dangerous base food, since it contains in high excess some nutrients, and (almost) totally lacks others. Therefore, comparing commercial canned food to this brings no useful information. Actually, it misinforms, suggesting that commercial canned food is healthy. | |
| Sep 30, 2017 at 5:43 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Sep 28, 2017 at 13:03 | history | answered | Haras Brummi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |